Post by shahadat560 on Jan 16, 2024 0:29:47 GMT -5
Have you ever wished more for the holidays? I think not. Both the previous year and this year were very intense, but this year more so because of everything that happened. Not only because of work, but also because of confinement. I haven't been to Pontevedra for four months and I really wanted to disconnect.
He returns in September but not to Los Desayunos . No, I'm going back to La noche en 24 horas , which is a similar format, what happens is that it consists more of analyzing everything that happened throughout the day, in the morning you mark more of the agenda. They are different rhythms. Mornings have more journalism, you're telling things as they happen, the night is more restful and it's good that you don't have to get up early. Of course, neither program allows you to have a lot of social life in Madrid due to the schedules.
I wish it would follow an iconic header like Los Desayunos
You expressed your disagreement with the end of Los Desayunos . Should I keep them? Once you consolidate a brand and make it a headline program I like to keep it. Even the BBC has its Breakfast , a format similar to ours. But it is also true that we have to let the new people who are coming to put their ideas into practice without putting obstacles in their way. They have every right to Country Email List make the changes they consider, just as I can say that I would like to see an emblematic header continue, with more than 25 years, like Los Desayunos , which also influenced formats for other chains.
If something characterizes Xabier Fortes, it is that he does not keep quiet, not even at an internal level within TVE in the News Council. Was it comfortable to work from that position? That was before, now I've let it go. It was a time when we got involved and denounced censorship and blacklists, but now I'm in another stage where that has changed for the better. Mistakes continue to be made, I make them almost every day because when you make a decision, you are always wrong. We then denounced the manipulative intent.
The fact of not being silent has caused him recurring controversies on Twitter. In my environment and in my life in general, I have no problem denouncing what I think is wrong, at a certain point I did it also in the defense of the public media. I have always done it, since I started practicing at the age of 22.
Have you thought about unsubscribing from Twitter? My wife tells me sometimes. Now in the summer I hardly see him. In addition, I play a lot with irony, which is something we also want to transfer to the program. Every now and then you get into a garden, you can answer an animal…
It cannot be resisted. When they are people from the world of journalism or politics with a certain projection, I have never rejected the melee if necessary. And I also think that you have to answer when there are attacks against your honesty that are falsehoods. I am not of the theory that it is better to keep quiet. If they attack you, you have to answer. Because he who is silent grants and I will not grant anything that is a defamation of my honor.
It can also be banging your head against a wall. But you have to answer, not everyone, you have to choose who you answer. Not to a guy with a hundred followers on Twitter, but if he's someone well-known, of course you have to answer, and they're also welcome to do so.
I have a good relationship with Espinosa de los Monteros, although sometimes we create some nonsense
There has been talk of how to deal with extreme right-wing discourse in the media, especially following the appearance of Vox. What should be done? interview them
There are professionals who have questioned the prominence given to this party in the media . You may like Vox or not, but it is a legal party, it has 52 deputies. On public television we are obliged by law to interview them. But even if I didn't have to, I would still talk to them, just like Bildu. Just because you don't like a person's speech, doesn't mean you shouldn't interview them. I would interview Hitler or Stalin, for example. But when I say interview I don't mean give a massage, we can't be confused. The audience needs to know what they think. Then decide whether you agree or not. But interviewing is not giving a speaker, it is asking questions, some more uncomfortable than others.
He returns in September but not to Los Desayunos . No, I'm going back to La noche en 24 horas , which is a similar format, what happens is that it consists more of analyzing everything that happened throughout the day, in the morning you mark more of the agenda. They are different rhythms. Mornings have more journalism, you're telling things as they happen, the night is more restful and it's good that you don't have to get up early. Of course, neither program allows you to have a lot of social life in Madrid due to the schedules.
I wish it would follow an iconic header like Los Desayunos
You expressed your disagreement with the end of Los Desayunos . Should I keep them? Once you consolidate a brand and make it a headline program I like to keep it. Even the BBC has its Breakfast , a format similar to ours. But it is also true that we have to let the new people who are coming to put their ideas into practice without putting obstacles in their way. They have every right to Country Email List make the changes they consider, just as I can say that I would like to see an emblematic header continue, with more than 25 years, like Los Desayunos , which also influenced formats for other chains.
If something characterizes Xabier Fortes, it is that he does not keep quiet, not even at an internal level within TVE in the News Council. Was it comfortable to work from that position? That was before, now I've let it go. It was a time when we got involved and denounced censorship and blacklists, but now I'm in another stage where that has changed for the better. Mistakes continue to be made, I make them almost every day because when you make a decision, you are always wrong. We then denounced the manipulative intent.
The fact of not being silent has caused him recurring controversies on Twitter. In my environment and in my life in general, I have no problem denouncing what I think is wrong, at a certain point I did it also in the defense of the public media. I have always done it, since I started practicing at the age of 22.
Have you thought about unsubscribing from Twitter? My wife tells me sometimes. Now in the summer I hardly see him. In addition, I play a lot with irony, which is something we also want to transfer to the program. Every now and then you get into a garden, you can answer an animal…
It cannot be resisted. When they are people from the world of journalism or politics with a certain projection, I have never rejected the melee if necessary. And I also think that you have to answer when there are attacks against your honesty that are falsehoods. I am not of the theory that it is better to keep quiet. If they attack you, you have to answer. Because he who is silent grants and I will not grant anything that is a defamation of my honor.
It can also be banging your head against a wall. But you have to answer, not everyone, you have to choose who you answer. Not to a guy with a hundred followers on Twitter, but if he's someone well-known, of course you have to answer, and they're also welcome to do so.
I have a good relationship with Espinosa de los Monteros, although sometimes we create some nonsense
There has been talk of how to deal with extreme right-wing discourse in the media, especially following the appearance of Vox. What should be done? interview them
There are professionals who have questioned the prominence given to this party in the media . You may like Vox or not, but it is a legal party, it has 52 deputies. On public television we are obliged by law to interview them. But even if I didn't have to, I would still talk to them, just like Bildu. Just because you don't like a person's speech, doesn't mean you shouldn't interview them. I would interview Hitler or Stalin, for example. But when I say interview I don't mean give a massage, we can't be confused. The audience needs to know what they think. Then decide whether you agree or not. But interviewing is not giving a speaker, it is asking questions, some more uncomfortable than others.