Post by rabia336 on Feb 19, 2024 23:41:14 GMT -5
We are not dangerous", with this message there are already more than , people who have signed an initiative by the Foundation for Advice and Action in Defense of Animals ( FAADA ) to end a law that they consider unfair: that of dogs potentially dangerous . The news published by announcing the intention of the general director of Animal Rights, Sergio García Torres , to review this law has reactivated a debate that seemed lost. Now, some associations hope that social pressure will not lead García Torres to back down from what many consider an unfair law that has stigmatized some breeds of dogs because of their appearance. The Faada foundation has been trying for some time to end what it considers a deeply unjust law. For this reason, he began a collection of signatures that has obtained great support. Nevertheless, they are not the only ones. The International Canine Defense Association and its Responsible Owners ( IADCRO ) have also conveyed to the animal rights arm of Pablo Iglesias.
Their desire to review a law that demonizes some breeds of dogs only for their visible characteristics, not for their character. SERGIO GARCÍA TORRES CONSIDERS THE CURRENT LAW UNFAIR It can be said with all letters, as has emerged from the meetings, that Sergio García Torres considers the current law unfair and that he is fully willing to look for an alt America Cell Phone Number List ernative that does not stigmatize the races that the current law discriminates against. by Taboolayou may like Óscar Puente supports Alberto Garzón: "You have to charge little and apologize for being a politician" The idea of his department is to find an alternative that avoids the hundreds of biased headlines that assure that, from that moment on, dog attacks on people will skyrocket. That alternative would be to focus on the owners, who are really responsible not only for the actions of their dog, but also for the character that the animal develops when it is an adult. In short, a law that focuses on educating and teaching owners what kind of dog they have.
Their hands and how they should educate it. Now, regional and municipal governments wash their hands by issuing a license that obligates and limits the animal, not the owner. The law considers the breeds as potentially dangerous exclusively due to their extraordinary physical capabilities, something that has led some people, so to speak, to use these animals for fights. What there is now is a generic legal framework that identifies eight breeds: the pit bull terrier, the Staffordshire bull terrier, the American Staffordshire terrier, the Rottweiler , the Dogo Argentino , the Fila Brasileiro , the Tosa inu and the Akita inu . Then the autonomous communities can add the breed they consider appropriate to this list. Galicia is the most aggressive community with this issue, considering up to breeds as dangerous. Those who support the law and are scandalized by any message that suggests repealing it cling to the dog attacks already documented and exaggerated by the.
Their desire to review a law that demonizes some breeds of dogs only for their visible characteristics, not for their character. SERGIO GARCÍA TORRES CONSIDERS THE CURRENT LAW UNFAIR It can be said with all letters, as has emerged from the meetings, that Sergio García Torres considers the current law unfair and that he is fully willing to look for an alt America Cell Phone Number List ernative that does not stigmatize the races that the current law discriminates against. by Taboolayou may like Óscar Puente supports Alberto Garzón: "You have to charge little and apologize for being a politician" The idea of his department is to find an alternative that avoids the hundreds of biased headlines that assure that, from that moment on, dog attacks on people will skyrocket. That alternative would be to focus on the owners, who are really responsible not only for the actions of their dog, but also for the character that the animal develops when it is an adult. In short, a law that focuses on educating and teaching owners what kind of dog they have.
Their hands and how they should educate it. Now, regional and municipal governments wash their hands by issuing a license that obligates and limits the animal, not the owner. The law considers the breeds as potentially dangerous exclusively due to their extraordinary physical capabilities, something that has led some people, so to speak, to use these animals for fights. What there is now is a generic legal framework that identifies eight breeds: the pit bull terrier, the Staffordshire bull terrier, the American Staffordshire terrier, the Rottweiler , the Dogo Argentino , the Fila Brasileiro , the Tosa inu and the Akita inu . Then the autonomous communities can add the breed they consider appropriate to this list. Galicia is the most aggressive community with this issue, considering up to breeds as dangerous. Those who support the law and are scandalized by any message that suggests repealing it cling to the dog attacks already documented and exaggerated by the.